05
Jan
2009
stored in: Health and Fitness | written by:

“What is that thing on your arm?”

I heard that question more than once while I wore the BodyBugg for three months to see how it worked and if it could really help accelerate weight loss. The device is a small monitor that tracks your calories burned, steps, activity and more. It’s been getting a lot of notice lately, especially since it was featured on national television. The participants on The Biggest Loser wear one to track their activity.

But can it really work for the average man or woman?

The GOOD: Wearing the BodyBugg, you are forced to face the reality of your activity level. Forget about questionnaires that ask you if you are somewhat active, moderately active or very active: there is no fooling yourself when you see the chart at the end of the day. Once you get used to having the BodyBugg on your arm, you almost can forget it’s there. The online interface compares your actual calories burned with how many calories you take in, and it keeps you honest by comparing what you say your deficit was with what your weight loss indicates. There are many improvements being made across the board including an updated, smaller BodyBugg (the one pictured is the one I used). More foods are being added to the database for food logging regularly.

The BAD: There is an adjustment period as you get comfortable wearing the armband. The online interface works with Internet Explorer, so if you are a Firefox aficionado, you will have to get used to IE for this. Also, the food logging and arm band syncing uses Flash, which is on the slow side.

MONEY MATTERS: The BodyBugg retails for $249 and is available online from BodyBugg directly. For about $349, it also comes with a visual display. However, 24 Hour Fitness has the BodyBugg with the digital display for $249 with a free visual display.

The MOM VERDICT

Sarah says: I knew that I didn’t live the most active lifestyle. However, using the BodyBugg I found that I don’t walk a whole lot or get a lot of exercise in. As a writer who works at home, I just don’t move as much as I should. Using the BodyBugg has helped me change that. And while due to the holidays and the demands of being a food writer, I didn’t lose much weight, I also didn’t have a big gain over the holidays like has typically happened. Now that it’s the New Year and I am recommitted to a healthy existence, the BodyBugg has been instrumental in showing me what exercises do the most for me. And while I hate that it uses Flash and Internet Explorer – two things I dislike – it’s a small price to pay for the accountability that you have with the BodyBugg. The one caveat? You have to be ready to do something about your weight – through a change in diet and exercise – if this is going to work. So, if you are ready, then I highly recommend this device. Two thumbs up here.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

9 Responses to “Review: BodyBugg”

  1. Fit Fare - » The New BodyBugg vs. The Old BodyBugg Says:

    [...] So, what’s the difference between the new BodyBugg and the old BodyBugg? [...]

  2. nicole Says:

    The difference is that there’s a smaller console and so it easier to wear. No one has even noticed the bb on my arm since I got it over a week ago. It’s light and doesn’t have as much bulk as the older gray model. I recommend it!

  3. scaron Says:

    Nicole, we will be reviewing the new BodyBugg on here soon! The new one is much less obtrusive — LOVE it!

  4. Ilene Says:

    I use Safari on a Mac. Will the BodyBugg work with Safari?

  5. Kerry Says:

    I really enjoyed your article and I can’t wait for my BodyBugg to arrive. There is a growing article bank at

    http://ichoosethin.com/thinblog/bodybugg-review/

    where they are starting a complete 6 month journey using BodyBugg. It is going to be a complete journey of how it worked and performed. I look forward to seeing what the 6 month review turns out and compare it to my own.

    KSQ

  6. Monica Says:

    Ilene, I just got the new bodybugg and ut does work on my mac with safari. You do need at least OSX.5 I believe though.

  7. Dwayne Says:

    I would like to wear it while swimming, snorkeling, or any other water activity, so is it water proof?

  8. RC Says:

    The latest Bodybugg works with Firefox just fine, and is 40% smaller than the version you show.

  9. Sarah Caron Says:

    Thank you for your comment, RC. This post was about the older BodyBugg, as indicated. We have since written about the new BodyBugg as well. And yes, it now works with Firefox–a more recent development that excited us a lot. Have a great day.

Leave a Reply